<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is RoboHelp Dead?&#8230; Again?!?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://charlesjeter.com/2007/08/31/is-robohelp-dead-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://charlesjeter.com/2007/08/31/is-robohelp-dead-again/</link>
	<description>Web 2.0 Integration in Southern California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelley</title>
		<link>http://charlesjeter.com/2007/08/31/is-robohelp-dead-again/comment-page-1/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlesjeter.com/2007/08/31/is-robohelp-dead-again/#comment-445</guid>
		<description>Adobe RoboHELP is not dead, it just has a new name -- Madcap FLARE. Adobe did not &quot;fire&quot; the RoboHELP development team. The entire group simply left to form their own company... maybe because Adobe was losing interest in RoboHELP. 

Whatever the reason they left, the result is a new direction, a much, much better product, and a great future for technical writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adobe RoboHELP is not dead, it just has a new name &#8212; Madcap FLARE. Adobe did not &#8220;fire&#8221; the RoboHELP development team. The entire group simply left to form their own company&#8230; maybe because Adobe was losing interest in RoboHELP. </p>
<p>Whatever the reason they left, the result is a new direction, a much, much better product, and a great future for technical writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samir</title>
		<link>http://charlesjeter.com/2007/08/31/is-robohelp-dead-again/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Samir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlesjeter.com/2007/08/31/is-robohelp-dead-again/#comment-149</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your help</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forfear</title>
		<link>http://charlesjeter.com/2007/08/31/is-robohelp-dead-again/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>forfear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlesjeter.com/2007/08/31/is-robohelp-dead-again/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Robohelp 7 has finally been released as planned, end of October 2007. It seems like this news is so fresh, there&#039;s been no comments or blogposts in the community on this yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robohelp 7 has finally been released as planned, end of October 2007. It seems like this news is so fresh, there&#8217;s been no comments or blogposts in the community on this yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are the bells tolling yet again for RoboHelp? at monkeyPi</title>
		<link>http://charlesjeter.com/2007/08/31/is-robohelp-dead-again/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Are the bells tolling yet again for RoboHelp? at monkeyPi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlesjeter.com/2007/08/31/is-robohelp-dead-again/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] all started with the Jetman wondering why RoboHelp wasn&#8217;t included in Adobe&#8217;s SEC and investor relations documents, and went from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all started with the Jetman wondering why RoboHelp wasn&#8217;t included in Adobe&#8217;s SEC and investor relations documents, and went from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CharlesJeter.com &#187; RoboHelp&#8217;s Dysfunctional Corporate Accounting &#124; All I Hear From Adobe Are Crickets</title>
		<link>http://charlesjeter.com/2007/08/31/is-robohelp-dead-again/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>CharlesJeter.com &#187; RoboHelp&#8217;s Dysfunctional Corporate Accounting &#124; All I Hear From Adobe Are Crickets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 08:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlesjeter.com/2007/08/31/is-robohelp-dead-again/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>[...] hearing crickets and very little else about Adobe&#8217;s exclusion of RoboHelp from their SEC and Investor Relations documents . I was hoping that someone close to Adobe would be able to figure out what was up with the budgets, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hearing crickets and very little else about Adobe&#8217;s exclusion of RoboHelp from their SEC and Investor Relations documents . I was hoping that someone close to Adobe would be able to figure out what was up with the budgets, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray</title>
		<link>http://charlesjeter.com/2007/08/31/is-robohelp-dead-again/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlesjeter.com/2007/08/31/is-robohelp-dead-again/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>There are 2 reasons why I switched from RoboHelp to Help and Manual:
1) The product was extremely buggy and I was wasting too much time fighting problems,
2) No mention of RoboHelp (or at least it was difficult to fine) in the Adobe web site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 2 reasons why I switched from RoboHelp to Help and Manual:<br />
1) The product was extremely buggy and I was wasting too much time fighting problems,<br />
2) No mention of RoboHelp (or at least it was difficult to fine) in the Adobe web site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

