<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe&#8217;s Technical Communication Suite Panned By TechComm Bloggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://charlesjeter.com/2007/09/25/adobes-technical-communication-suite-panned-by-techcomm-bloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://charlesjeter.com/2007/09/25/adobes-technical-communication-suite-panned-by-techcomm-bloggers/</link>
	<description>Web 2.0 Integration in Southern California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:46:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adobe&#8217;s Technical Communication Suite announced &#171; just write click</title>
		<link>http://charlesjeter.com/2007/09/25/adobes-technical-communication-suite-panned-by-techcomm-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Adobe&#8217;s Technical Communication Suite announced &#171; just write click</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlesjeter.com/2007/09/25/adobes-technical-communication-suite-panned-by-techcomm-bloggers/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>[...] writers will still be the only users in a company using FrameMaker. Charles Jeter notes the same lack of collaboration in the suite in a nice wrap up post as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] writers will still be the only users in a company using FrameMaker. Charles Jeter notes the same lack of collaboration in the suite in a nice wrap up post as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techcommdood</title>
		<link>http://charlesjeter.com/2007/09/25/adobes-technical-communication-suite-panned-by-techcomm-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>techcommdood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlesjeter.com/2007/09/25/adobes-technical-communication-suite-panned-by-techcomm-bloggers/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Sarah, I was a bit surprised at the  non-XML solution as well. Given all the time and energy they&#039;d spent getting FM to work well with DITA, the pairing of FM and RH leaves me scratching my head. Unless this is another means of continuing to keep the unstructured sales pipeline alive (like multiple undo).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah, I was a bit surprised at the  non-XML solution as well. Given all the time and energy they&#8217;d spent getting FM to work well with DITA, the pairing of FM and RH leaves me scratching my head. Unless this is another means of continuing to keep the unstructured sales pipeline alive (like multiple undo).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah O'Keefe</title>
		<link>http://charlesjeter.com/2007/09/25/adobes-technical-communication-suite-panned-by-techcomm-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah O'Keefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlesjeter.com/2007/09/25/adobes-technical-communication-suite-panned-by-techcomm-bloggers/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Hi Charles,

SixOfRoboHelp? Cute. Where did you get that I didn&#039;t like it?

My real issue with the TC Suite is that I think the focus should be on XML-based solutions, and this ain&#039;t it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Charles,</p>
<p>SixOfRoboHelp? Cute. Where did you get that I didn&#8217;t like it?</p>
<p>My real issue with the TC Suite is that I think the focus should be on XML-based solutions, and this ain&#8217;t it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
